Delay event identification
Cataloguing of each delay event with date, cause, contractual entitlement category and supporting evidence.
Engineering Consultancy Service
The website is loading. Please wait.
Billing & Claims
Extension of time submissions built on programme evidence — delay event, notice record, critical path impact and mitigation demonstrated — rather than on narrative appeals.
Overview
An extension of time claim is decided by records created months before anyone writes it. The notice served within the contractual period. The baseline programme that was credible. The delay log kept while the delay was happening. Where those exist, a legitimate claim is usually approved. Where they do not, no amount of persuasive writing recovers it.
We prepare EOT submissions that demonstrate rather than assert: this event occurred on this date, notice was served here, the critical path moved by this many days, and this is the mitigation that was attempted. Where the record has gaps, we say so and build the strongest defensible position from what exists.
Scope
Every element below is covered as standard. Anything outside it is quoted separately and agreed before we begin.
Cataloguing of each delay event with date, cause, contractual entitlement category and supporting evidence.
Verification that notices were served within the contractual period, and assessment of the position where they were not.
Demonstration of how each event affected the driving path, using time impact or as-planned versus as-built analysis as appropriate.
Honest analysis of concurrent contractor-caused delay, because an unaddressed concurrency argument will be raised against you anyway.
Documentation of steps taken to mitigate, which is a requirement under most conditions of contract and frequently overlooked.
Complete submission with narrative, programme exhibits, evidence appendices and a quantified time entitlement.
Our Approach
01
Assessors approve demonstrated critical path movement. They discount arguments about how difficult the project was.
02
We assess concurrent delay ourselves and deal with it in the submission. Ignoring it simply lets the other side frame it.
03
We identify the notice and record failures that weakened this claim so the next one on the same contract is stronger.
Questions
If yours is not answered here, call us — the conversation is free and usually short.
+977 1 4538 720Related
Most clients engage two or three of these together, which is usually cheaper than commissioning them separately.
Baseline programmes, resource histograms and method statements that reflect how the work will actually be executed — and that hold…
Read moreVariation proposals with the instruction traced, the quantity impact measured, the new rate derived from contract principles, and …
Read moreA single organised contract record — correspondence, approvals, test results, instructions and photographs — indexed from day one …
Read moreFree scope review · No obligation
A bidding document, a contract, a stalled bill, a stack of unrecorded measurements — whatever the position, a senior engineer will review it and come back within one working day with a written assessment, a timeline and a fixed price. There is no charge for this and nothing to sign.